To determine which graph matches the sequence of the decay rate of the bird species modeled by the equation \( y = 4,060(0.95)^t \), we first complete the input-output table by calculating the number of birds at each of the given years.
Using the formula \( y = 4,060(0.95)^t \):
-
For \( t = 0 \): \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^0 = 4,060(1) = 4,060 \]
-
For \( t = 5 \): \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^5 \approx 4,060(0.7738) \approx 3,137.43 \approx 3,137 \]
-
For \( t = 10 \): \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^{10} \approx 4,060(0.5987) \approx 2,426.46 \approx 2,426 \]
-
For \( t = 15 \): \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^{15} \approx 4,060(0.4633) \approx 1,882.38 \approx 1,882 \]
-
For \( t = 20 \): \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^{20} \approx 4,060(0.3487) \approx 1,415.36 \approx 1,415 \]
Now we can summarize the values in the table:
| Years (t) | Number of Birds (y) | |-----------|----------------------| | 0 | 4,060 | | 5 | 3,137 | | 10 | 2,426 | | 15 | 1,882 | | 20 | 1,415 |
Now, let's identify the right graph among the options provided. Since we need a graph that shows the exponential decay over 20 years and the number of birds dropping significantly, the appropriate choice would be the graph that:
- Shows the number of birds starting around 4,000 and decreasing steadily.
- Clearly indicates the lower range of the number of birds (as the values calculated decline quickly).
From the descriptions of the graphs you provided, look for the graph that best fits these criteria, specifically one that aligns with the rapid decay observed in the calculations and retains the significant drop in bird population over time while being bounded (not extending excessively beyond 5,000 or less than 0).
Based on the decay factor and calculated values, the most suitable graph would likely be the one that has a more zoomed-in focused look on the y-axis (between 0 and 6,000) or perhaps explicitly ranges closer to the calculated values (1,000 to 5,000). Look for a graph that reflects these characteristics to make your selection accordingly.