To answer the question, we first need to calculate the values of the number of birds (y) for the given years (t) using the provided equation:
\[ y = 4,060(0.95)^t \]
Let's calculate for each year:
-
At t = 0: \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^0 = 4,060(1) = 4,060 \]
-
At t = 5: \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^5 \approx 4,060(0.7748) \approx 3,143.21 \] Rounding to the nearest whole number: \( y \approx 3,143 \)
-
At t = 10: \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^{10} \approx 4,060(0.5987) \approx 2,427.38 \] Rounding to the nearest whole number: \( y \approx 2,427 \)
-
At t = 15: \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^{15} \approx 4,060(0.4633) \approx 1,880.66 \] Rounding to the nearest whole number: \( y \approx 1,881 \)
-
At t = 20: \[ y = 4,060(0.95)^{20} \approx 4,060(0.3487) \approx 1,415.24 \] Rounding to the nearest whole number: \( y \approx 1,415 \)
Now, the completed input-output table is:
| Years (t) | Number of Birds (y) | |-----------|----------------------| | 0 | 4,060 | | 5 | 3,143 | | 10 | 2,427 | | 15 | 1,881 | | 20 | 1,415 |
Analysis of the Graphs
Since the number of birds decreases over time, we are looking for a graph with a steadily declining curve that starts at around 4,060 and decreases to around 1,415 by 20 years.
- The first option shows a decreasing pattern, but covers a x-axis range up to 30 years. We must check if it starts near 4,060 and decreases correctly.
- The second option also only shows up to 10 years. It might not show the entire trend as it does not reach 20 years.
- The third option also extends from 40,000 to 52,000, which is not relevant to our bird population.
- The fourth option has the correct axes (from 0 to 30 for x and up to 6000 for y which encompasses our values from years 0 to 20).
Given the values we calculated and the axes range, the best option would be:
The first option with the x-axis ranging from 0 to 30 (in increments of 1) and y-axis from 0 to 600 (in increments of 20).
This option captures the trend across the entire specified range and has a decreasing pattern as required.