To evaluate Oliver's work accurately, let's inspect the expression given:
(x + 3)(x + 4) = 0
Using the Zero Product Property, we set each factor equal to zero to find the values of \(x\):
- x + 3 = 0 leads to \(x = -3\)
- x + 4 = 0 leads to \(x = -4\)
From the table you provided, it looks like there is confusion regarding the equations listed.
- The first row correctly identifies one factor as x + 3 = 0, which leads to x = -3.
- However, in the second row, instead of saying x + 4 = 0, it incorrectly states x - 4 = 0, which is incorrect.
Hence, the correct answers should be:
- From x + 3 = 0, you get \(x = -3\).
- From x + 4 = 0, you would get \(x = -4\).
Therefore, in response to your question regarding Oliver's work:
No, x + 4 = 0 in the second row should be x - 4 = 0. is not accurate. Instead, it should recognize that he made an error with the equation, which was supposed to be x + 4 = 0 which leads to \(x = -4\).
So, the answer that fits your context best would be:
No, x - 3 = 0 in the second row should be x + 3 = 0.
You may also phrase it as: No, his second factor should state x + 4 = 0 instead of x - 4 = 0.
Thus Oliver's work is not accurate.