The correct response is:
Zoya has it backward. The growth rate of f(x)=2^x is always greater than the growth rate of g(x)=20x.
Here's the reasoning:
- The function \( f(x) = 2^x \) is an exponential function, which grows much faster than the linear function \( g(x) = 20x \) as \( x \) increases.
- While at small values of \( x \) (like 1, 2, 3, etc.), the terms for \( g(x) \) may be greater than those for \( f(x) \), as \( x \) continues to increase, the values of \( f(x) \) will surpass those of \( g(x) \) significantly.
- This shows that the exponential growth rate (for \( f(x) \)) ultimately outstrips the linear growth rate (for \( g(x) \)).