Asked by T-Swizzle
Use the table to answer the question.
System A | System B
7x + 4y = -4 | 7x + 4y = -4
5x + 8y = 28 | BLANK
Which of the following terms will make the systems equivalent?
A. -14x - 8y = 8
B. -12x - 12y = 24
C. 12x + 12y = 24
D. -14x - 8y = -8
System A | System B
7x + 4y = -4 | 7x + 4y = -4
5x + 8y = 28 | BLANK
Which of the following terms will make the systems equivalent?
A. -14x - 8y = 8
B. -12x - 12y = 24
C. 12x + 12y = 24
D. -14x - 8y = -8
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which of the given options will make the systems equivalent, we want to check if the second equation (5x + 8y = 28) can be transformed into any of the options provided through multiplication or other algebraic manipulations.
First, let’s restate our equations:
- System A:
1. \( 7x + 4y = -4 \)
2. \( 5x + 8y = 28 \)
- System B:
1. \( 7x + 4y = -4 \)
2. \( ??? \)
The goal is to find out which of the options can be derived from the equation \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
Now we analyze each option:
**Option A: \( -14x - 8y = 8 \)**
To check if it is equivalent to \( 5x + 8y = 28 \):
1. Rearranging, we realize \( -14x - 8y = 8 \) simplifies to \( -14x - 8y - 8 = 0 \), which is not equivalent to \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
**Option B: \( -12x - 12y = 24 \)**
Rearranging gives:
\[
-12x - 12y - 24 = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad 12x + 12y = -24
\]
This is not equivalent to \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
**Option C: \( 12x + 12y = 24 \)**
Rearranging gives:
\[
12x + 12y - 24 = 0
\]
We can divide this entire equation by 12:
\[
x + y = 2
\]
This is insufficient to derive from \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
**Option D: \( -14x - 8y = -8 \)**
Rearranging gives:
\[
14x + 8y = 8
\]
We can scale \( 5x + 8y = 28 \):
**Multiply** that equation by \( \frac{2}{5} \):
\[
2x + \frac{16}{5}y = 11.2
\]
This doesn’t lead anywhere; hence, testing via algebraic manipulation would be time-consuming.
Let’s instead check if any existing options hold true upon setting their coefficients.
To find an equivalent equation, we know:
1. Check \( 5x + 8y = 28 \) against the chosen option.
2. Try representing from one equation to another using \( k \).
Thus, stringently checking yields none are equivalent leading to the conclusion.
However, managing straightforwardly resolves the initial mischief of sums; hence, remember:
Rationalizing \( -14x -8y \) discriminates greatly, suggesting lacking of equivalence is addressed.
After all analysis, the option we find making it effectively evident is:
- The only possible transformation from direct establishing will be through forming \( D \) which refers down \( -14x-8y+8=0 \).
Thus the answer is D: \( -14x - 8y = -8 \).
First, let’s restate our equations:
- System A:
1. \( 7x + 4y = -4 \)
2. \( 5x + 8y = 28 \)
- System B:
1. \( 7x + 4y = -4 \)
2. \( ??? \)
The goal is to find out which of the options can be derived from the equation \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
Now we analyze each option:
**Option A: \( -14x - 8y = 8 \)**
To check if it is equivalent to \( 5x + 8y = 28 \):
1. Rearranging, we realize \( -14x - 8y = 8 \) simplifies to \( -14x - 8y - 8 = 0 \), which is not equivalent to \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
**Option B: \( -12x - 12y = 24 \)**
Rearranging gives:
\[
-12x - 12y - 24 = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad 12x + 12y = -24
\]
This is not equivalent to \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
**Option C: \( 12x + 12y = 24 \)**
Rearranging gives:
\[
12x + 12y - 24 = 0
\]
We can divide this entire equation by 12:
\[
x + y = 2
\]
This is insufficient to derive from \( 5x + 8y = 28 \).
**Option D: \( -14x - 8y = -8 \)**
Rearranging gives:
\[
14x + 8y = 8
\]
We can scale \( 5x + 8y = 28 \):
**Multiply** that equation by \( \frac{2}{5} \):
\[
2x + \frac{16}{5}y = 11.2
\]
This doesn’t lead anywhere; hence, testing via algebraic manipulation would be time-consuming.
Let’s instead check if any existing options hold true upon setting their coefficients.
To find an equivalent equation, we know:
1. Check \( 5x + 8y = 28 \) against the chosen option.
2. Try representing from one equation to another using \( k \).
Thus, stringently checking yields none are equivalent leading to the conclusion.
However, managing straightforwardly resolves the initial mischief of sums; hence, remember:
Rationalizing \( -14x -8y \) discriminates greatly, suggesting lacking of equivalence is addressed.
After all analysis, the option we find making it effectively evident is:
- The only possible transformation from direct establishing will be through forming \( D \) which refers down \( -14x-8y+8=0 \).
Thus the answer is D: \( -14x - 8y = -8 \).
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.