Use the table to answer the question. State Date of Admission to the Union Status of Slavery at the Time of Admission Ohio 1803 Free state Louisiana 1812 Slave-holding state Indiana 1816 Free state Mississippi 1817 Slave-holding state Illinois 1818 Free state Alabama 1819 Slave-holding state Maine 1820 Free state Missouri 1821 Slave-holding state What conclusion can be drawn from the table? (1 point) Responses The movement for the abolition of slavery grew in Southern states during the early nineteenth century. The movement for the abolition of slavery grew in Southern states during the early nineteenth century. The use of popular sovereignty to determine the legality of slavery deescalated sectional conflicts. The use of popular sovereignty to determine the legality of slavery deescalated sectional conflicts. The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states. The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states. The threat of European trade embargoes convinced state and federal leaders to outlaw slavery. The threat of European trade embargoes convinced state and federal leaders to outlaw slavery.

Answer 1

The conclusion that can be drawn from the table is: The expansion of the United States increased sectional tensions between the states.

The table shows a pattern of free states and slave-holding states being admitted to the Union, which reflects the growing conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions during this period. The addition of new states often intensified debates over the balance of power in Congress and the future of slavery in the nation.