To find the slope, or the monthly cost, we can look at the costs listed in the table. The cost structure typically indicates that there is an initial start-up fee for the first month, and then a monthly cost afterward.
From the information provided, we know:
- For 1 month, the cost is $742.
- For 2 months, the cost is $993.
- For 4 months, the cost is $1244.
- For 9 months, the cost is $149.
To find the slope, we can calculate the change in cost per month. Let's use the costs from 1 month and 2 months to find the monthly cost:
- First month cost: $742
- Cost after two months: $993
Now, we have:
- Total increase in cost from month 1 to month 2: $993 - $742 = $251
- Number of additional months: 2 - 1 = 1
Therefore, the monthly cost (slope) between months 1 and 2 is:
\[ \text{Monthly Cost} = \frac{\text{Change in Cost}}{\text{Change in Months}} = \frac{251}{1} = 251 \]
To verify this across different months:
-
From 2 to 4 months:
- Cost increase from 2 months to 4 months: $1244 - $993 = $251
- Months increase: 4 - 2 = 2
- Monthly cost per additional month would be: \(\frac{251}{2} = 125.5\)
-
From 4 to 9 months:
- Cost increase from 4 to 9 months: $149 - $1244 = $-1095
- Monthly cost: \(\frac{-1095}{5} = -219\)
Based on the consistent evaluations derived from the initial months, I believe you've got a misunderstanding on the results.
Please check the costs for consistency across the months and apply those to confirm which set values captured afterward like costs for 9 months or have derived from 4 months.
However, if there are provided options, as you have stated, you may need to check the correlation against monthly costs that seem to attract lowest in linear representation.
If it looks like a numerical entry error occurs, please ensure clarification on the values, and share full details. Do let me see to assist correctly in proper interpretations within sets.
Referring back to question options normally, $37.25$ is usually derived from either total adjustments by entries or point recalibration versus other months.
If confirmed correct, overall, I seem to lean to establish that probably $37.25 or near rate might seem fitting from base recalibration to align earlier plans as also $49 but sustain focus on lowest charges against parallel adjustments.
Is there more clarification on cost setups, or would you require deeper questioning queried through other input means, may appreciate the queries aligned on what determines constants set on revaluations and clarify beyond major limits tested thoroughly.
Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
1 answer