Use the table to answer the question. Comparing the Interpretations of the Constitution Strict Constructionism Liberal Constructionism ??? The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to the right to vote and this includes restricting the power of states to write voting laws when these violate civil rights. What is the best interpretation to insert in the first column of the table?(1 point) Responses The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote, and gives it Congress the power to write and pass national voting laws. The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote, and gives it Congress the power to write and pass national voting laws. The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote and this includes federal powers to supervise state elections. The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote and this includes federal powers to supervise state elections. The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote, and the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review of state voting laws. The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote, and the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review of state voting laws. The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote, and the states retain the power to write their own voting laws.

Answer 1

In the context of strict constructionism, the best interpretation to insert in the first column of the table is:

"The Fifteenth Amendment protects the rights of all races to vote, and the states retain the power to write their own voting laws."

This interpretation aligns with strict constructionism, which emphasizes limiting the federal government's powers and adhering closely to the text of the Constitution, allowing states significant authority in areas like voting laws.

Answer 2

Read the following excerpt from the Fifteenth Amendment: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Describe how this law attempted to reconcile the discrepancy between American ideals and public policy. (1 point) Responses Large numbers of people march on Washington for the passage of laws. Large numbers of people march on Washington for the passage of laws. The Supreme Court addresses the Fifteenth Amendment’s constitutionality. The Supreme Court addresses the Fifteenth Amendment’s constitutionality. The NAACP lobbies Congress for passage of a right-to-vote law. The NAACP lobbies Congress for passage of a right-to-vote law. Congress passes a law to ensure all people have the right to vote.

Answer 3

The most fitting response to describe how the Fifteenth Amendment sought to reconcile the discrepancy between American ideals and public policy is:

"Congress passes a law to ensure all people have the right to vote."

This response illustrates how the amendment aimed to align the principles of equality and democracy, enshrined in American ideals, with legislative action to protect the voting rights of all citizens, regardless of race. The Fifteenth Amendment sought to eliminate racial discrimination in voting, thereby reinforcing the commitment to civil rights and addressing the failures of public policy that had historically disenfranchised African Americans.

Answer 4

How does the Fourteenth Amendment affect citizenship?(1 point) Responses It says that Black people may not be citizens or file cases in federal court. It says that Black people may not be citizens or file cases in federal court. It says that anyone born in the U.S. automatically becomes a U.S. citizen. It says that anyone born in the U.S. automatically becomes a U.S. citizen. It says that a child born of a U.S. citizen outside the U.S. becomes a U.S. citizen automatically. It says that a child born of a U.S. citizen outside the U.S. becomes a U.S. citizen automatically. It says that immigrants living in the U.S. are granted citizenship upon entry to the U.S.

Answer 5

The correct response regarding how the Fourteenth Amendment affects citizenship is:

"It says that anyone born in the U.S. automatically becomes a U.S. citizen."

The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, includes the Citizenship Clause, which establishes that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens of the United States, thereby ensuring that citizenship cannot be denied based on race or previous condition of servitude.

Answer 6

How are citizens and noncitizen rights similar in the U.S.?(1 point) Responses They both have the right to vote. They both have the right to vote. They both may carry U.S. passports. They both may carry U.S. passports. They both are entitled to Constitutional protections. They both are entitled to Constitutional protections. They both might be required to serve on juries.

Answer 7

The correct response regarding how citizens and noncitizens' rights are similar in the U.S. is:

"They both are entitled to Constitutional protections."

While citizens have additional rights, such as the right to vote and eligibility for certain government positions, both citizens and noncitizens are entitled to protections under the U.S. Constitution, including due process and equal protection under the law.

Answer 8

Use the excerpt to answer the question. “The question presented is whether an Indian tribe’s police officer has authority to detain temporarily and to search a non-Indian on a public right-of-way that runs through an Indian reservation. The search and detention, we assume, took place based on a potential violation of state or federal law prior to the suspect’s transport to the proper nontribal authorities for prosecution. We have previously noted that a tribe retains inherent sovereign authority to address “conduct [that] threatens or has some direct effect on . . . the health or welfare of the tribe.” We believe this statement of law governs here. And we hold the tribal officer possesses the authority at issue.” According to this excerpt from the Supreme Court case United States v. Cooley (2021), what legal precedent was established for tribal sovereignty by this ruling? (1 point) Responses Tribal areas are coequal with states, thus giving Indigenous Americans the same power to tax and police. Tribal areas are coequal with states, thus giving Indigenous Americans the same power to tax and police. States do not have jurisdiction to prosecute crimes in areas previously promised to Indigenous Americans despite legal traditions of state control. States do not have jurisdiction to prosecute crimes in areas previously promised to Indigenous Americans despite legal traditions of state control. Tribal areas are not foreign nations but wards or domestic dependent nations of the U.S. Tribal areas are not foreign nations but wards or domestic dependent nations of the U.S. Tribal authority to police extends beyond Indigenous Americans to all U.S. citizens who might be present on tribal land.

Answer 9

The correct response regarding the legal precedent established for tribal sovereignty by the ruling in United States v. Cooley (2021) is:

"Tribal authority to police extends beyond Indigenous Americans to all U.S. citizens who might be present on tribal land."

This ruling affirmed that tribal officers have the authority to detain and search individuals, regardless of their tribal status, if the conduct threatens the health or welfare of the tribe, thereby recognizing the broader scope of tribal sovereign authority in law enforcement.

Answer 10

I migrated to the U.S. 10 years ago. I planned to stay in the U.S. permanently, but was only allowed to stay temporarily. Eventually, my permission to stay in the U.S. expired, but I did not return to my home country. I am now categorized as(1 point) Responses a documented noncitizen. a documented noncitizen. a lawful permanent resident. a lawful permanent resident. a temporary resident. a temporary resident. an undocumented noncitizen.

Answer 11

Based on your description, since your permission to stay expired and you did not return to your home country, you are now categorized as:

"an undocumented noncitizen."

This term refers to individuals who are in the U.S. without valid immigration status or permission.