To determine which country should focus on producing bananas, we need to analyze both absolute and comparative advantages based on the production data in the table.
Absolute Advantage:
- Country A can produce 1500 bananas, while Country B can produce 1600 bananas.
- Therefore, Country B has the absolute advantage in banana production because it can produce more bananas than Country A.
Comparative Advantage: To determine comparative advantage, we compare the opportunity costs for each country when switching from producing one good to another.
Opportunity cost for Country A:
- If Country A produces 1500 bananas, it could produce up to 500 apples. Therefore, the opportunity cost of producing one banana for Country A is: \[ \text{Opportunity cost of 1 banana} = \frac{500 \text{ apples}}{1500 \text{ bananas}} = \frac{1}{3} \text{ apples/banana} \]
Opportunity cost for Country B:
- If Country B produces 1600 bananas, it could produce up to 800 apples. Therefore, the opportunity cost of producing one banana for Country B is: \[ \text{Opportunity cost of 1 banana} = \frac{800 \text{ apples}}{1600 \text{ bananas}} = \frac{1}{2} \text{ apples/banana} \]
Comparative advantage conclusion:
- Country A has a lower opportunity cost for bananas (1/3 apples) compared to Country B (1/2 apples). Therefore, Country A has a comparative advantage in producing bananas.
Final Decision: Based on the analysis above, the correct response is: Country A since it has the comparative advantage in banana production.