To determine which store has the better buy on footballs, we need to analyze the costs provided for Store 1 and compare them with the cost information likely pertaining to Store 2.
From the data you provided for Store 1:
- The cost of 1 football is $12
- The cost of 2 footballs is $24 ($12 each)
- The cost of 3 footballs is $36 ($12 each)
From the graph description, it suggests a linear relationship where the cost of footballs increases at a consistent rate (likely implying $12 per football).
Now, to determine the costs for Store 2 (which is inferred from the available responses), it appears that Store 2 offers a better deal. Based on the responses you offered, the lowest individual cost mentioned in response options for Store 2 is $9 (with no specific quantity given).
Let's analyze the potential responses:
- Store 1 has the better buy on footballs. Store 2’s football costs $9, and Store 1’s football costs $3.
- Store 2 has the better buy on footballs. Store 1’s football costs $24, and Store 2’s football costs $9.
- Store 2 has the better buy on footballs. Store 1’s football costs $12, and Store 2’s football costs $9.
- Store 1 has the better buy on footballs. Store 2’s football costs $12, and Store 1’s football costs $9.
Given the cost per football:
- Store 1 costs $12 per football.
- Store 2 most likely costs $9 per football.
With Store 2 being lower than Store 1, the conclusion is:
Store 2 has the better buy on footballs. Store 1’s football costs $12, and Store 2’s football costs $9.
Thus, the correct response based on your options is:
Store 2 has the better buy on footballs. Store 1’s football costs $12, and Store 2’s football costs $9.