Two close friends, Nell and Hamish, are competing against each other in a tournament. They are evenly matched in skill, and it becomes apparent that they will both make it to the final round. However, Hamish is accused of cheating in the semifinals by one of his opponents. Nell has proof that Hamish couldn’t have cheated. However, allowing Hamish to be disqualified would make Nell the winner of the tournament by default.
If the story’s theme is about good sportsmanship, what would be the most logical conclusion to this story?
(1 point)
Responses
Nell reaches out to Regina, the tournament organizer, for help in clearing Hamish’s name.
Nell reaches out to Regina, the tournament organizer, for help in clearing Hamish’s name.
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
Nell does something to get disqualified from the tournament as well.
Nell does something to get disqualified from the tournament as well.
Nell refuses to speak up in defense of Hamish and wins the tournament.
1 answer
Given the theme of good sportsmanship, the most logical conclusion to the story would be:
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
This choice reflects the values of integrity and fairness, which are essential aspects of good sportsmanship. Nell acting to defend Hamish demonstrates loyalty and honesty, and it also allows both friends to compete on equal terms.
3 answers
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer