Two close friends, Nell and Hamish, are competing against each other in a tournament. They are evenly matched in skill, and it becomes apparent that they will both make it to the final round. However, Hamish is accused of cheating in the semifinals by one of his opponents. Nell has proof that Hamish couldn’t have cheated. However, allowing Hamish to be disqualified would make Nell the winner of the tournament by default.
If the story’s theme is about good sportsmanship, what would be the most logical conclusion to this story?
(1 point)
Responses
Nell does something to get disqualified from the tournament as well.
Nell does something to get disqualified from the tournament as well.
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
Nell reaches out to Regina, the tournament organizer, for help in clearing Hamish’s name.
Nell reaches out to Regina, the tournament organizer, for help in clearing Hamish’s name.
Nell refuses to speak up in defense of Hamish and wins the tournament.
Nell refuses to speak up in defense of Hamish and wins the tournament.
1 answer
The most logical conclusion to the story, given its theme of good sportsmanship, is:
Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
This choice highlights Nell's integrity and commitment to fair play, reinforcing the theme of good sportsmanship.
