Which evidence included in the second paragraph is least relevant to the speaker’s argument?
(1 point)
Responses
A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.
A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.
Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.
Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.
And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.
Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.
1 answer
The evidence that is least relevant to the speaker’s argument is:
And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
This statement does not directly support the argument regarding the effectiveness or benefits of voting versus contests in the naming process; it simply provides an example of another town's decision. The other pieces of evidence present specific comparisons or direct feedback about the voting process itself, making them more relevant to the argument.
