The statement that best explains why one source should probably be removed is: "Source 1 is too old because it was published over fifty years ago." This highlights a significant issue regarding the relevance and applicability of the information in contemporary contexts, as older sources may not reflect current knowledge or practices.
Use the sources and scenario description to answer the question. After analyzing the writer’s list of sources, which statement best explains why one source should probably be removed? (1 point) Responses Source 2 is not reputable because it is a blog where the author can publish whatever they want. Source 2 is not reputable because it is a blog where the author can publish whatever they want. Source 1 is not credible because it has an anonymous author. Source 1 is not credible because it has an anonymous author. Source 2 is not credible because there is no proof that Robert Teller is a criminology expert. Source 2 is not credible because there is no proof that Robert Teller is a criminology expert. Source 1 is too old because it was published over fifty years ago.
1 answer
1 answer