The correct answer is "appeal to emotion." This phrase suggests that if you allow someone a small concession, they will exploit it excessively, which plays on feelings of distrust or fear regarding others' intentions.
Use the sentence to answer the question.
When you give them an inch, they will take a mile.
Which kind of flawed reasoning is this?
(1 point)
Responses
gambler’s fallacy
gambler’s fallacy
appeal to emotion
appeal to emotion
false dichotomy
false dichotomy
appeal to authority
11 answers
Text 1: Online spaces that allow people in local communities to gift unneeded items to one another are growing in popularity—but how do they impact our communities? Supporters of these groups explain that the lack of a middleman in this type of giving helps cut down on monetary and time costs for everyone. With just a few clicks and a quick handoff, community members can find what they need or get rid of what they don’t need—all for free. Critics of these systems explain that this kind of convenience comes with risks. One risk is personal safety, as participants might share their home addresses with strangers in order to exchange items. Additionally, the owner of a secondhand store pointed out that the rise of these groups has hurt their business and could eventually constrain their ability to serve community members who are not comfortable or knowledgeable about online groups. Regardless of the mixed impact, these groups have arrived and continue to grow in use and popularity nationwide.
Text 2: Online “spend nothing” exchange groups are a worthy addition to the community effort to cut waste and improve quality of life. Data from a recent study in the area shows a significant decrease in the number of emergency financial assistance requests to local charities since the groups were created. Although critics have concerns about the safety of participants, the harm they fear is only hypothetical; there have yet to be any actual problematic incidents linked to the group. Most groups even have rules designed to protect their members. Others have suggested these groups will harm local secondhand stores, but many of the participants are guided to such stores by group members when they post searching for items no one has on hand to gift. One might even argue that these groups help secondhand stores by spreading the word about their locations and the types of things they are likely to sell. Overall, this trend enriches the local community and helps get things that might otherwise be destined for the dump into the hands of people who can give them new life.
Question
Use the two texts to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, make an inference based on the two texts. Include an explanation about how the two articles work together to support your inference.
(4 points)
Text 2: Online “spend nothing” exchange groups are a worthy addition to the community effort to cut waste and improve quality of life. Data from a recent study in the area shows a significant decrease in the number of emergency financial assistance requests to local charities since the groups were created. Although critics have concerns about the safety of participants, the harm they fear is only hypothetical; there have yet to be any actual problematic incidents linked to the group. Most groups even have rules designed to protect their members. Others have suggested these groups will harm local secondhand stores, but many of the participants are guided to such stores by group members when they post searching for items no one has on hand to gift. One might even argue that these groups help secondhand stores by spreading the word about their locations and the types of things they are likely to sell. Overall, this trend enriches the local community and helps get things that might otherwise be destined for the dump into the hands of people who can give them new life.
Question
Use the two texts to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, make an inference based on the two texts. Include an explanation about how the two articles work together to support your inference.
(4 points)
Based on the two texts, one can infer that while online gifting groups contribute positively to community engagement and resource recycling, they also pose challenges to traditional businesses and personal safety. Text 1 highlights the concerns surrounding personal safety and the impact on secondhand stores, indicating that not all community members may feel comfortable with or benefit from these systems. Conversely, Text 2 emphasizes the positive outcomes of these groups, such as reduced requests for emergency assistance and increased awareness of local secondhand stores. Together, these texts illustrate the complex dynamics of such community initiatives, showcasing both their potential benefits and drawbacks.
Consider the cheese stick. It is not a beautiful food. It also isn't particularly healthy. Cheese sticks are about as commonplace as snack food gets.
Yet in the packaged version that ends up in so many kids' lunch boxes, each cylinder of mozzarella or cheddar is individually wrapped, like a high-end truffle. And, every day, thousands of those little pieces of plastic wrap are thrown in the trash.
But that may not be the case for long.
Two researchers at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have developed a film made from a milk protein. The film can be eaten with the cheese. Which means that it may not be too long before we have a wrapper we can eat. It also could be healthy. Edible plastic exists, but it's largely made of starch, not protein.
1 of 5
Question
Use the passage to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, analyze how the author used rhetoric to advance their point of view. Include a statement explaining the author’s purpose.
(4 points)
Yet in the packaged version that ends up in so many kids' lunch boxes, each cylinder of mozzarella or cheddar is individually wrapped, like a high-end truffle. And, every day, thousands of those little pieces of plastic wrap are thrown in the trash.
But that may not be the case for long.
Two researchers at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have developed a film made from a milk protein. The film can be eaten with the cheese. Which means that it may not be too long before we have a wrapper we can eat. It also could be healthy. Edible plastic exists, but it's largely made of starch, not protein.
1 of 5
Question
Use the passage to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, analyze how the author used rhetoric to advance their point of view. Include a statement explaining the author’s purpose.
(4 points)
The author employs rhetorical techniques such as contrast and imagery to advance the point of view that while cheese sticks are an unremarkable snack, innovations in packaging can significantly improve their environmental impact. By juxtaposing the mundane nature of the cheese stick with the extravagant imagery of an individually wrapped truffle, the author emphasizes the absurdity of using plastic waste for a simple snack. Furthermore, the mention of researchers developing an edible film made from milk protein injects hope and urgency into the argument, suggesting that a solution to the waste problem is on the horizon. The author's purpose is to highlight the potential benefits of edible packaging as a sustainable alternative that aligns with contemporary health and environmental concerns.
Use the passage to answer the question.
LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL
Credit Line: Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” April 16, 1963. The Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr.
In 3–5 sentences, explain how the speaker’s word choice and the relationships among words in the paragraph beginning with “My friends, I must say to you …” and ending with “... cup of coffee at a lunch counter.” produce a specific tone.
(4 points)
LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL
Credit Line: Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” April 16, 1963. The Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr.
In 3–5 sentences, explain how the speaker’s word choice and the relationships among words in the paragraph beginning with “My friends, I must say to you …” and ending with “... cup of coffee at a lunch counter.” produce a specific tone.
(4 points)
In the paragraph beginning with "My friends, I must say to you …" and ending with "… cup of coffee at a lunch counter," Dr. King employs an inclusive and conversational word choice that fosters a sense of camaraderie and urgency. The use of the phrase “my friends” establishes a respectful and intimate connection with the audience, inviting them to engage with the emotional weight of his message. Words such as “urgency” and “freedom” convey a passionate tone, underscoring the moral imperative behind the civil rights movement. Additionally, contrasting the simple act of enjoying a "cup of coffee" with the broader struggle for justice highlights the inequities faced by African Americans, deepening the emotional impact of his plea and reinforcing the seriousness of the civil rights cause.
From Vancouver to Halifax, plastic plates, plastic bags and plastic straws may be on their way out. But a possible country-wide prohibition on certain single-use plastic products may not address the spread of the most insidious plastic litter, some scientists say.
According to Canadian officials, the potential bans — which could go into effect as early as 2021 — would not only curb litter but also cut nearly 2 million tons of carbon pollution. They claim the policy would also stimulate the economy by creating 42,000 jobs.
“I am, like a lot of scientists, excited, with a lot of caveats,” said Max Liboiron, an environmental scientist at Memorial University in Newfoundland.
Plastics can persist for hundreds, if not thousands of years in the environment. Plastic litter can entangle and kill wildlife, or break down into tiny particles — microplastics — that collect and leach out heavy metals or harmful chemicals. While recycling can repurpose plastic materials into other products, fewer than 10 percent of plastics are actually recycled. The bulk of recyclable plastic is currently in limbo, as countries in Asia have shut their doors to shipments of other nations’ trash.
1 of 6
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain how the writer uses valid reasoning to develop an overall argument.
(4 points)
According to Canadian officials, the potential bans — which could go into effect as early as 2021 — would not only curb litter but also cut nearly 2 million tons of carbon pollution. They claim the policy would also stimulate the economy by creating 42,000 jobs.
“I am, like a lot of scientists, excited, with a lot of caveats,” said Max Liboiron, an environmental scientist at Memorial University in Newfoundland.
Plastics can persist for hundreds, if not thousands of years in the environment. Plastic litter can entangle and kill wildlife, or break down into tiny particles — microplastics — that collect and leach out heavy metals or harmful chemicals. While recycling can repurpose plastic materials into other products, fewer than 10 percent of plastics are actually recycled. The bulk of recyclable plastic is currently in limbo, as countries in Asia have shut their doors to shipments of other nations’ trash.
1 of 6
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain how the writer uses valid reasoning to develop an overall argument.
(4 points)
The writer employs valid reasoning by presenting evidence from both officials and environmental scientists to support the argument that banning certain single-use plastics is a necessary yet incomplete solution to plastic pollution. The mention of intended outcomes, such as the reduction of litter and carbon pollution, bolsters the claims made by Canadian officials. However, the writer also introduces the opinions of scientists like Max Liboiron, who express cautious optimism regarding the bans, highlighting the longevity and harmful effects of plastics in the environment. By acknowledging the limitations of recycling and the challenges posed by microplastics, the writer effectively underscores the complexity of the issue, advocating for a more comprehensive approach to addressing plastic waste beyond just legislative bans.
The average person uses a typical plastic bag for as short a time as 12 minutes before throwing it away, never thinking of where it may end up.
Yet once consigned to a landfill, that standard grocery store tote takes hundreds or thousands of years to break down — much more than a human lifetime. Bags make up an alarming amount of the plastic found in whale stomachs or bird nests, and it’s no wonder — globally, we use between 1 and 5 trillion plastic bags each year.
Biodegradable plastic bags are marketed as more eco-friendly solutions, able to break down into harmless material more quickly than traditional plastics. One company claims their shopping bag “will degrade and biodegrade in a continuous, irreversible and unstoppable process” if it ends up as litter in the environment.
In a study published this week in Environmental Science and Technology, researchers put supposedly eco-friendly bags made from various organic and plastic materials and sourced from U.K. stores to the test. After three years buried in garden soil, submerged in ocean water, exposed to open light and air or stashed in a laboratory, none of the bags broke down completely in all the environments.
1 of 7
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain one example of valid reasoning and explain how that example strengthens the overall argument.
(4 points)
Yet once consigned to a landfill, that standard grocery store tote takes hundreds or thousands of years to break down — much more than a human lifetime. Bags make up an alarming amount of the plastic found in whale stomachs or bird nests, and it’s no wonder — globally, we use between 1 and 5 trillion plastic bags each year.
Biodegradable plastic bags are marketed as more eco-friendly solutions, able to break down into harmless material more quickly than traditional plastics. One company claims their shopping bag “will degrade and biodegrade in a continuous, irreversible and unstoppable process” if it ends up as litter in the environment.
In a study published this week in Environmental Science and Technology, researchers put supposedly eco-friendly bags made from various organic and plastic materials and sourced from U.K. stores to the test. After three years buried in garden soil, submerged in ocean water, exposed to open light and air or stashed in a laboratory, none of the bags broke down completely in all the environments.
1 of 7
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain one example of valid reasoning and explain how that example strengthens the overall argument.
(4 points)
One example of valid reasoning in the article is the comparison between the short lifespan of a plastic bag in use—averaging just 12 minutes—and its long decomposition period, which can span hundreds to thousands of years. This stark contrast effectively highlights the environmental impact of plastic bags, emphasizing the disconnect between their brief utility and their long-term harm. Additionally, the findings from the recent study that tested biodegradable bags, which did not break down completely after three years in various environments, further strengthen the argument by undermining claims made by manufacturers regarding the eco-friendliness of their products. Together, these points reinforce the notion that simply substituting traditional plastic bags with biodegradable options may not be a viable solution to the plastic pollution crisis, urging a need for more sustainable practices.
1 answer