Use the sentence to answer the question. Littering destroys the planet. Which evaluation of the logic used in this sentence is most accurate? (1 point) Responses The choice to employ the gambler’s fallacy undermines the argument by falsely predicting future outcomes. The choice to employ the gambler’s fallacy undermines the argument by falsely predicting future outcomes. The choice to attack people who litter undermines the argument by alienating the audience. The choice to attack people who litter undermines the argument by alienating the audience. The choice to use a frightening framing undermines the argument by overstating the impact of small actions. The choice to use a frightening framing undermines the argument by overstating the impact of small actions. The choice to make a false analogy undermines the argument by diminishing the real harm littering does. The choice to make a false analogy undermines the argument by diminishing the real harm littering does.
1 answer
The most accurate evaluation of the logic used in the sentence "Littering destroys the planet" is: The choice to use a frightening framing undermines the argument by overstating the impact of small actions.
This assessment highlights how the statement could evoke fear about littering while possibly exaggerating the immediate effects of littering on a global scale, leading to an emotional rather than a rational response.
