Opposing claim: Tiktok should not be banned.
Counter argument 1: Tiktok provides a platform for creative expression and cultural exchange. It allows users to showcase their talents, share their stories, and connect with diverse individuals from around the world. Banning Tiktok would deprive millions of users the opportunity to express themselves and engage with a global community.
Counter argument 2: Tiktok has implemented strict safety measures to protect its users. They have implemented features like privacy settings, content filters, and reporting mechanisms to ensure a safe environment for all users. Banning Tiktok would not only take away a popular and enjoyable app, but it would also undermine the efficacy of these safety measures, potentially leading users towards less secure and regulated platforms.
Use the sentence below to answer the questions.
“Tiktok should be banned”
In three to five sentences, write an opposing claim. In your answer, you should also include two points you might use to counter that opposing claim.
(4 points)
help!!!
3 answers
i said "should be banned" not "should not be banned"
Apologies for the misunderstanding. Here is an opposing claim to your statement:
Opposing claim: Tiktok should be allowed to operate freely.
Counter argument 1: Banning Tiktok violates freedom of speech and expression. As an app that allows users to create and share their content, banning it would limit individuals' ability to express themselves and connect with others. It is important to uphold individuals' right to freedom of expression, even if not all content aligns with everyone's taste.
Counter argument 2: Tiktok has become an increasingly popular platform for businesses and content creators to reach their target audience. Banning Tiktok would not only hinder the growth and success of these individuals, but it would also have negative economic implications. By allowing Tiktok to operate freely, it provides opportunities for entrepreneurship and supports the digital economy.
Opposing claim: Tiktok should be allowed to operate freely.
Counter argument 1: Banning Tiktok violates freedom of speech and expression. As an app that allows users to create and share their content, banning it would limit individuals' ability to express themselves and connect with others. It is important to uphold individuals' right to freedom of expression, even if not all content aligns with everyone's taste.
Counter argument 2: Tiktok has become an increasingly popular platform for businesses and content creators to reach their target audience. Banning Tiktok would not only hinder the growth and success of these individuals, but it would also have negative economic implications. By allowing Tiktok to operate freely, it provides opportunities for entrepreneurship and supports the digital economy.