Use the scenario to answer the question. Someone purchases a disposable water bottle, uses it several times, then throws it in the garbage. How would you evaluate these actions in terms of conservation? (1 point) Responses It is better than reusing it only once, but they should not be drinking so much water. It is better than reusing it only once, but they should not be drinking so much water. It is better than using a glass to drink water from the tap, but they should not be drinking so much water. It is better than using a glass to drink water from the tap, but they should not be drinking so much water. It is better than using a glass to drink water from the tap, but they should recycle the bottle. It is better than using a glass to drink water from the tap, but they should recycle the bottle. It is better than using the bottle only once, but they should recycle the bottle.

Answer 1

The actions of purchasing a disposable water bottle, using it several times, and then throwing it in the garbage can be evaluated in terms of conservation as follows:

While reusing the bottle several times is a better option than using it only once or opting for a new single-use bottle each time, ultimately disposing of it in the garbage is not a sustainable practice. Ideally, the individual should either recycle the bottle or use a more environmentally friendly option, such as a reusable water bottle made of materials like stainless steel or glass.

Therefore, the best evaluation of these actions in terms of conservation would align with this thought process: "It is better than using the bottle only once, but they should recycle the bottle."

Answer 2

so whats the answer

Answer 3

The best answer in the context of evaluating the actions in terms of conservation is:

"It is better than using the bottle only once, but they should recycle the bottle."