On September 19, 2019, Governor Greg Abbott declared the state of Texas a disaster. Tropical Storm Imelda caused extensive damage. Governor Abbott requested a presidential disaster declaration on October 1, 2019. The request included a 31-page letter that provided details of the damage and the needs of specific demographics. Federal disaster relief was granted on October 4, 2019.
Which of the following best describes the impact of the governor’s decision?
(1 point)
Responses
Governor Abbott’s decision was an intended impact because the relief improved and protected the public.
Governor Abbott’s decision was an intended impact because the relief improved and protected the public.
Governor Abbott’s decision was an intended impact because the EPA provided a Hazard Mitigation Program.
Governor Abbott’s decision was an intended impact because the EPA provided a Hazard Mitigation Program.
Governor Abbott’s decision was an unintended impact because it decreased funding to protect the public.
Governor Abbott’s decision was an unintended impact because it decreased funding to protect the public.
Governor Abbott’s decision was an unintended impact because it required people to pay back the loans.
1 answer
The best description of the impact of Governor Abbott’s decision is:
Governor Abbott’s decision was an intended impact because the relief improved and protected the public.
This is because the primary goal of declaring a disaster and requesting federal assistance is to ensure that resources and aid are provided to help those affected by the disaster, ultimately improving and protecting the well-being of the public.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer