Use the scenario to answer the question. Bluewater Free is a company that reduces pollution in both freshwater and saltwater sources in the United States. Dr. William Acorn, the founder of Bluewater Free, was recently pictured by a drinking water company with their product, suggesting that Dr. Acorn drinks this water. Which statement best summarizes how the U.S. government would address this scenario to protect intellectual property rights? (1 point) Responses A trade secret would be protected by the 1979 Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA). A trade secret would be protected by the 1979 Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA). A right of publicity would give the company the right to trademark Dr. Acorn in order to prevent unauthorized product endorsements. A right of publicity would give the company the right to trademark Dr. Acorn in order to prevent unauthorized product endorsements. The 1976 Copyright Act provides authors with the legal rights to copy, distribute, and display their work publicly. The 1976 Copyright Act provides authors with the legal rights to copy, distribute, and display their work publicly. A patent would be issued once the company submits an application and it is reviewed and approved by the USPTO. A patent would be issued once the company submits an application and it is reviewed and approved by the USPTO.

Answer 1

The best statement that summarizes how the U.S. government would address the scenario to protect intellectual property rights is: A right of publicity would give the company the right to trademark Dr. Acorn in order to prevent unauthorized product endorsements.

This statement is most relevant to the scenario where Dr. Acorn's likeness is used in a way that could imply an endorsement of the drinking water company's product without his authorization. The right of publicity relates to an individual's right to control the commercial use of their name and likeness.