Use the political cartoon to answer the question. What does the image suggest about the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court ruling? (1 point) Responses Jim Crow laws are not discriminatory. Jim Crow laws are not discriminatory. Segregation spread to the northern states. Segregation spread to the northern states. Segregation was not required in the South. Segregation was not required in the South. Separate accommodations are not acceptable. Separate accommodations are not acceptable. Skip to navigation

Answer 1

While I can't see the specific political cartoon you're referencing, I can provide insight based on the historical context of the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling, which upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine.

If the cartoon depicts the negative impacts of segregation, highlights injustices, or mocks the idea of being "separate but equal," it might suggest that "separate accommodations are not acceptable." Conversely, if it downplays the impact or suggests that segregation was justifiable, it might imply that "Jim Crow laws are not discriminatory."

Given the historical critique of the ruling and its implications for African Americans and civil rights, the most fitting response that aligns with a critical view of the ruling would be "Separate accommodations are not acceptable." If you could provide more details about the cartoon, I could tailor the response even further!