To determine the best evaluation of how the passage authors develop their arguments, we need to consider the specific techniques each author uses in their writing.
The first response indicates that both authors connect with readers through personal experiences. This can be a strong method for engaging an audience but may not capture all the nuances of their arguments if one author does not use this technique.
The second response points out that both authors support their claims with similar facts and statistics. This would suggest they are relying on evidence to bolster their arguments, which is a common technique in argumentative writing.
The third response highlights that the author of Passage 1 acknowledges counterclaims, while the author of Passage 2 dismisses them. This suggests a difference in how each author handles opposing viewpoints, which is an important aspect of argumentation.
The fourth response notes that the author of Passage 1 uses humor while the author of Passage 2 relies on logic. This indicates a stylistic difference that could significantly influence how each argument is received by readers.
Based on these evaluations, the choice that best captures the differences in argumentation and development styles is:
The author of Passage 1 acknowledges counterclaims, while the author of Passage 2 dismisses them.
This choice effectively outlines a key differentiation in how each author approaches their argument, making it the best option.
1 answer