Use the passage to answer the question. Writing Prompt Write an argument to be presented at a professional aerospace engineering conference. Argue whether the educational requirements to enter the profession should be increased. Writer’s Notes Intended audience: professional aerospace engineers Background information: provide an in-depth explanation of current educational requirements for aerospace engineering. Domain-specific vocabulary: touch briefly on key terms and include relevant visuals as necessary. Other notes: attendees will likely come from a broad range of backgrounds with varied opinions. I will likely touch on several arguments for and against increasing the educational requirements to enter the profession to build a strong case for my point of view. Which part of the plan will detract from the writer’s purpose given the intended audience? (1 point) Responses Broaden the topic of the discussion, because some attendees may be currently enrolled in educational programs. Broaden the topic of the discussion, because some attendees may be currently enrolled in educational programs. Provide detailed definitions for key terms, because some attendees may be unfamiliar with industry jargon. Provide detailed definitions for key terms, because some attendees may be unfamiliar with industry jargon. Narrow the focus of the presentation to one side of the education debate, because most attendees will already agree with the main point of view. Narrow the focus of the presentation to one side of the education debate, because most attendees will already agree with the main point of view. Reduce time spent discussing current education requirements, because most attendees will already be familiar with them. Reduce time spent discussing current education requirements, because most attendees will already be familiar with them.

1 answer

The part of the plan that will detract from the writer’s purpose given the intended audience is: Narrow the focus of the presentation to one side of the education debate, because most attendees will already agree with the main point of view.

This approach could limit the effectiveness of the argument by not fully addressing the nuances of the debate. A successful presentation at a professional conference should consider multiple perspectives and counterarguments to engage the audience effectively, fostering a more comprehensive discussion about the educational requirements in the aerospace engineering field.