The two correct answers for why this is an effective conclusion to the author’s argument are:
- It includes a clear call to action.
- It reframes the thesis statement.
Use the passage to answer the question. Thesis statement: To preserve the heritage of people who speak different languages and the cultural knowledge these languages impart, we must recognize their value and make targeted efforts to ensure their survival. We should support these ambitious initiatives with our donations and volunteer time. They are practical and proven ways of reviving languages without federal assistance and without the goal of implementing the languages on a wide scale. The goal of preserving languages is apolitical; it is simply a way to preserve cultural history. “When humanity loses a language, we also lose the potential for greater diversity in art, music, literature and oral traditions,” said Bögre Udell of Wikitongues. Language is a living object worthy of survival. All languages must be valued enough to be kept alive. Why is this an effective conclusion to the author’s argument? Select the two correct answers. (1 point) Responses It includes a clear call to action. It includes a clear call to action. It reframes the thesis statement. It reframes the thesis statement. It introduces new pieces of evidence. It introduces new pieces of evidence. It avoids making appeals to ethos. It avoids making appeals to ethos. It acknowledges counterclaims.
1 answer