To provide a detailed analysis, I'd need the specific passage you're referring to. Please share the passage, and I'll assist you in analyzing the author's use of rhetoric and their purpose.
Use the passage to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, analyze how the author used rhetoric to advance their point of view. Include a statement explaining the author’s purpose.
(4 points)
9 answers
Consider the cheese stick. It is not a beautiful food. It also isn't particularly healthy. Cheese sticks are about as commonplace as snack food gets.
Yet in the packaged version that ends up in so many kids' lunch boxes, each cylinder of mozzarella or cheddar is individually wrapped, like a high-end truffle. And, every day, thousands of those little pieces of plastic wrap are thrown in the trash.
But that may not be the case for long.
Two researchers at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have developed a film made from a milk protein. The film can be eaten with the cheese. Which means that it may not be too long before we have a wrapper we can eat. It also could be healthy. Edible plastic exists, but it's largely made of starch, not protein.
1 of 5
Question
Use the passage to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, analyze how the author used rhetoric to advance their point of view. Include a statement explaining the author’s purpose.
(4 points)
Yet in the packaged version that ends up in so many kids' lunch boxes, each cylinder of mozzarella or cheddar is individually wrapped, like a high-end truffle. And, every day, thousands of those little pieces of plastic wrap are thrown in the trash.
But that may not be the case for long.
Two researchers at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have developed a film made from a milk protein. The film can be eaten with the cheese. Which means that it may not be too long before we have a wrapper we can eat. It also could be healthy. Edible plastic exists, but it's largely made of starch, not protein.
1 of 5
Question
Use the passage to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, analyze how the author used rhetoric to advance their point of view. Include a statement explaining the author’s purpose.
(4 points)
In the passage, the author employs contrast and imagery to highlight the incongruity between the mundane nature of cheese sticks and the innovative potential of edible packaging. By describing the cheese stick as "not a beautiful food" and "not particularly healthy," the author establishes a sense of dissatisfaction with traditional snack foods. This is juxtaposed with the exciting development of an edible film made from milk protein, which not only reduces waste but also hints at improved health benefits. The author’s purpose is to advocate for creative solutions to food packaging waste while prompting readers to consider both the environmental impact of common snacks and the possibilities of innovative alternatives.
From Vancouver to Halifax, plastic plates, plastic bags and plastic straws may be on their way out. But a possible country-wide prohibition on certain single-use plastic products may not address the spread of the most insidious plastic litter, some scientists say.
According to Canadian officials, the potential bans — which could go into effect as early as 2021 — would not only curb litter but also cut nearly 2 million tons of carbon pollution. They claim the policy would also stimulate the economy by creating 42,000 jobs.
“I am, like a lot of scientists, excited, with a lot of caveats,” said Max Liboiron, an environmental scientist at Memorial University in Newfoundland.
Plastics can persist for hundreds, if not thousands of years in the environment. Plastic litter can entangle and kill wildlife, or break down into tiny particles — microplastics — that collect and leach out heavy metals or harmful chemicals. While recycling can repurpose plastic materials into other products, fewer than 10 percent of plastics are actually recycled. The bulk of recyclable plastic is currently in limbo, as countries in Asia have shut their doors to shipments of other nations’ trash.
1 of 6
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain how the writer uses valid reasoning to develop an overall argument.
(4 points)
According to Canadian officials, the potential bans — which could go into effect as early as 2021 — would not only curb litter but also cut nearly 2 million tons of carbon pollution. They claim the policy would also stimulate the economy by creating 42,000 jobs.
“I am, like a lot of scientists, excited, with a lot of caveats,” said Max Liboiron, an environmental scientist at Memorial University in Newfoundland.
Plastics can persist for hundreds, if not thousands of years in the environment. Plastic litter can entangle and kill wildlife, or break down into tiny particles — microplastics — that collect and leach out heavy metals or harmful chemicals. While recycling can repurpose plastic materials into other products, fewer than 10 percent of plastics are actually recycled. The bulk of recyclable plastic is currently in limbo, as countries in Asia have shut their doors to shipments of other nations’ trash.
1 of 6
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain how the writer uses valid reasoning to develop an overall argument.
(4 points)
The writer uses valid reasoning by presenting factual information and expert opinions to explore the complexities of proposed bans on single-use plastics. They highlight the potential benefits of the bans, such as reducing carbon pollution and creating jobs, while also addressing significant concerns raised by scientists like Max Liboiron regarding the persistence of plastics in the environment and the limitations of recycling. By emphasizing the long-term environmental impacts of plastic litter and the low recycling rates, the author builds a balanced argument that underscores the need for comprehensive solutions beyond mere bans on certain products. This approach effectively encourages readers to consider both the immediate advantages and the broader implications of plastic pollution.
The average person uses a typical plastic bag for as short a time as 12 minutes before throwing it away, never thinking of where it may end up.
Yet once consigned to a landfill, that standard grocery store tote takes hundreds or thousands of years to break down — much more than a human lifetime. Bags make up an alarming amount of the plastic found in whale stomachs or bird nests, and it’s no wonder — globally, we use between 1 and 5 trillion plastic bags each year.
Biodegradable plastic bags are marketed as more eco-friendly solutions, able to break down into harmless material more quickly than traditional plastics. One company claims their shopping bag “will degrade and biodegrade in a continuous, irreversible and unstoppable process” if it ends up as litter in the environment.
In a study published this week in Environmental Science and Technology, researchers put supposedly eco-friendly bags made from various organic and plastic materials and sourced from U.K. stores to the test. After three years buried in garden soil, submerged in ocean water, exposed to open light and air or stashed in a laboratory, none of the bags broke down completely in all the environments.
1 of 7
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain one example of valid reasoning and explain how that example strengthens the overall argument.
(4 points)
Yet once consigned to a landfill, that standard grocery store tote takes hundreds or thousands of years to break down — much more than a human lifetime. Bags make up an alarming amount of the plastic found in whale stomachs or bird nests, and it’s no wonder — globally, we use between 1 and 5 trillion plastic bags each year.
Biodegradable plastic bags are marketed as more eco-friendly solutions, able to break down into harmless material more quickly than traditional plastics. One company claims their shopping bag “will degrade and biodegrade in a continuous, irreversible and unstoppable process” if it ends up as litter in the environment.
In a study published this week in Environmental Science and Technology, researchers put supposedly eco-friendly bags made from various organic and plastic materials and sourced from U.K. stores to the test. After three years buried in garden soil, submerged in ocean water, exposed to open light and air or stashed in a laboratory, none of the bags broke down completely in all the environments.
1 of 7
Question
Use the article to answer the question.
In 3–5 sentences, explain one example of valid reasoning and explain how that example strengthens the overall argument.
(4 points)
One example of valid reasoning in the article is the contrasting lifespan of traditional plastic bags, which can take hundreds or thousands of years to decompose, with the short usage time of just 12 minutes. This stark comparison highlights the environmental burden that plastic bags impose despite their brief utility, emphasizing the urgency of finding sustainable alternatives. Additionally, the study results indicating that supposedly biodegradable bags do not break down in various environments after three years strengthens the overall argument by demonstrating that even marketed eco-friendly options may not provide the anticipated benefits. This evidence reinforces the need for more effective solutions to address plastic waste rather than relying on misleading claims about biodegradable products.
Based on the two texts, it can be inferred that online "spend nothing" exchange groups have a mixed impact on communities. While supporters argue that these groups reduce monetary and time costs for community members by allowing them to easily exchange unneeded items, critics point out the potential risks to personal safety and the negative impact on local secondhand stores. The first text highlights the concerns raised by critics, while the second text presents counterarguments and defends the value of these exchange groups. Together, the two texts provide a balanced view of the impact of online exchange groups on communities.
(4 points)
(4 points)
The inference about the mixed impact of online "spend nothing" exchange groups is supported by the contrasting perspectives outlined in the two texts. The first text raises concerns related to safety risks and the detrimental effects on local secondhand stores, illustrating the potential downsides of these exchange platforms. In contrast, the second text emphasizes the benefits of reducing costs and fostering community connections through the ability to easily share or obtain items without monetary exchange. This balanced representation effectively highlights both the positive aspects and the criticisms of these groups, encouraging readers to consider the complexities of their influence on community dynamics. Ultimately, the discussion serves to inform community members about the trade-offs involved in participating in such exchange networks.
5 answers