Argument 1: Grades should not be given in schools. A single grade does not show everything that a student has learned and can do. Oftentimes, grades can be subjective based on a teacher's grading beliefs. Good grades do not always predict a student's success later in life.
Argument 2: Grades are important for schools. Grades help students, parents, and teachers to know how students are understanding the material of the class. Without grades, schools would only be able to pass or fail students. Getting a bad grade can motivate a student to work harder to improve.
Which piece of evidence would best strengthen the idea that grades should not be given in schools in Argument 1?
(1 point)
Responses
Students can earn poor grades because they have not completed assignments, not because they do not understand.
Students can earn poor grades because they have not completed assignments, not because they do not understand.
Parents do not see the grades for all assignment that their children complete.
Parents do not see the grades for all assignment that their children complete.
Parents received grades when they were in school, so they understand their children's grades.
Parents received grades when they were in school, so they understand their children's grades.
Students who move from one school to another can show their current knowledge to their new schools through their grades.
1 answer
The piece of evidence that would best strengthen the idea that grades should not be given in schools in Argument 1 is:
"Students can earn poor grades because they have not completed assignments, not because they do not understand."
This evidence supports the argument by highlighting that grades may not accurately reflect a student's understanding or knowledge, aligning with the claim that a single grade does not show everything a student has learned.
