The author supports the claim that people who release non-native animals into the wild should be punished by including evidence that the tegu lizard is destroying the environment in the Florida Everglades and endangering native species. This evidence illustrates the negative impact of releasing non-native animals, which justifies the need for penalties. Therefore, the correct choice is not explicitly listed in your options, but it aligns closest to the idea of using evidence of ecological harm to support the argument for punishment.
Use the paragraph to answer the question
Releasing non-native animals into the wild upsets the food chains of native species. The tegu lizard has been introduced into the Florida Everglades and is destroying the environment. The lizard will eat anything that crosses its path, including small mammals, birds, insects, plants, and eggs, leaving animals of this ecosystem in danger. If all parts of the environment are on the reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should penalized with a significant fine.
How does the author support the claim that people who release non-native animals into wild should be punished?
By including evidence that shows that animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment
By including evidence that shows that animals are more likely to thrive in their native animals into the wild should be punished?
By including evidence that shows that animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment.
By including data that shows that people might be tempted to take an animal out of its native environment
1 answer