The best interpretation of the role of the hyperbole in this paragraph is: It is meant to emphasize that Paul Bunyan had a lot of people working for him. The exaggeration about the number of cooks and the uncertainty Paul had about the total number of men highlights the large scale of his operations and the workforce he managed.
Use the paragraph to answer the question.
Feeding Paul Bunyan's crews was a complicated job. At no two camps were conditions the same. The winter he logged off North
Dakota he had 300 cooks making pancakes for the Seven Axemen and the little Chore-boy. At headquarters on the Big Onion he
had one cook and 462 cookees feeding a crew so big that Paul himself never knew within several hundred either way, how many
men he had.
Which is the best interpretation of the role of the hyperbole in this paragraph?
It is meant to emphasize the work ethic of Paul Bunyan himself.
It is meant to emphasize that Paul Bunyan’s cooks liked to work in groups.
It is meant to emphasize the amount of work that Paul Bunyan’s crew completed every day.
It is meant to emphasize that Paul Bunyan had a lot of people working for him.
1 answer
1 answer