The statement that is out of place is "Different artists express themselves using art." This statement is broader and does not specifically relate to the claim about graffiti being a type of art, whereas the other statements directly address aspects of graffiti itself, either supporting it as an art form or critiquing it as vandalism.
Use the outline to answer the
question.
Claim: Graffiti is a type of art.
Graffiti allows people to
express themselves
creatively.
Graffiti artists use
colors and
designs to show
their personal
style.
Graffiti is similar
to painting and
can be
considered an art
form.
Graffiti is a type of
vandalism.
Graffiti requires
great skill and
creativity.
Graffiti destroys
public property.
Which statement is out of place?
Different artists express
themselves using art.
Graffiti destroys public
property.
Graffiti allows people to
express themselves creatively.
Graffiti requires great skill and
creativity.
1 answer