To determine which statements are correct about both introductory sections of the essays, let's analyze the provided options:
-
Both address assumptions that may be vague or incorrect.
- This statement suggests that both essays take a critical approach towards common beliefs or ideas that may not be entirely accurate. If both essays do this, it indicates that the authors aim to clarify misconceptions about the issues they are discussing.
-
Both assume the reader has already been persuaded of the importance of tackling climate change.
- This statement implies that both introductory sections proceed from the understanding that their audience already acknowledges the significance of climate change. If this is true, the authors might not need to present foundational arguments about the importance of the issue, focusing instead on deeper implications or specific arguments.
-
Both seek to convince readers of the importance of housing the population.
- This option indicates that both essays are focused on the importance of housing, suggesting a common goal. If both essays do indeed aim to highlight housing's importance, they would share a thematic focus rather than paralleling a different issue (like climate change).
-
Both ask the reader to consider their immediate surroundings in the context of societal issues.
- This indicates a call to action or reflection from the reader regarding how local contexts relate to broader societal challenges. If both essays encourage this kind of introspection, it suggests a similarity in approach.
-
Both survey past trends leading up to the present moment.
- This option refers to both essays looking at historical context as a means to understand current situations. If both introductions do this, it would show an emphasis on understanding the evolution of the issues discussed.
Based on common features often found in essay introductions, the most likely correct statements about both introductory sections would be:
-
Both address assumptions that may be vague or incorrect. - This is likely because strong introductions often aim to clarify misconceptions, leading to a more informed discussion.
-
Both ask the reader to consider their immediate surroundings in the context of societal issues. - This option often reflects a common literary device to engage readers personally, making them reflect on their own experiences in connection to broader themes.
These two statements are selected because they suggest an engagement strategy that is common in persuasive writing, where challenging assumptions and calling for personal reflection are effective rhetorical techniques.