Use the information from the two sources to answer the question.

Question

Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.

Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. 

On which fact do the two sources disagree? 

(1 point)
Responses

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.

There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.

Recycling programs in schools damage the environment. and tell me if your sure

Answer 1

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness of recycling programs in schools.

Source 1 emphasizes that the participation of many people (such as those in school districts) is necessary for recycling to have a positive environmental impact, suggesting that large-scale participation is beneficial.

Source 2, however, highlights the challenges of getting all students to follow a specific recycling program, indicating that this can make the program ineffective.

Therefore, the correct point of disagreement is:

"There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan."

This statement reflects the concerns raised in Source 2, contrasting with the idea in Source 1 that participation is key to successful recycling efforts.

I'm confident in this analysis.