Use the information from the two sources to answer the question.

Question

Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.

Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. 

On which fact do the two sources disagree? 

(1 point)
Responses

Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.

Answer 1

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness of recycling programs in schools. Source 1 emphasizes the necessity and potential positive impact of school districts participating in recycling to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, implying that participation can lead to successful outcomes. In contrast, Source 2 points out the difficulties in getting all students to follow a specific recycling program, suggesting that this can make recycling efforts ineffective. Therefore, the disagreement lies in the effectiveness and feasibility of implementing recycling programs in schools.

However, since none of the exact response options provided match this assessment, the closest response would be:

"There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan."

This reflects the concern present in Source 2 about the challenges of participation because of the large number of individuals involved, which Source 1 does not address.