Use the information from the two sources to answer the question. Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment. Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective.  On which fact do the two sources disagree?  (1 point) Responses There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan. There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan. There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. Recycling programs in schools damage the environment. Recycling programs in schools damage the environment. Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

1 answer

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness and feasibility of recycling programs in schools. Source 1 emphasizes the necessity of participation from school districts for recycling to have a positive environmental impact, implying that this participation is crucial for success. In contrast, Source 2 highlights the challenges and potential ineffectiveness of getting all students to follow a recycling program, suggesting that the size and complexity of school districts might hinder the success of such programs.

Therefore, the fact they disagree on is:

"Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people."