Use the information from the two sources to answer the question. Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment. Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. On which fact do the two sources disagree? (1 point) Responses Recycling programs in schools damage the environment. Recycling programs in schools damage the environment. There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. There is a need to protect the environment with recycling. There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan. There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan. Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

Answer 1

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness and feasibility of recycling programs in schools. Source 1 emphasizes that school districts' participation in recycling is necessary for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and having a positive environmental impact. In contrast, Source 2 points out the challenges and potential ineffectiveness of recycling programs due to the difficulty of getting all students to follow a specific program. Therefore, the fact on which the two sources disagree is:

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.