To determine the correct statement, we need to analyze the definitions of minerals and the characteristics of the substances provided.
-
Substance A:
- Organic
- Naturally occurring
- Solid
Organic substances are generally not considered minerals because minerals are typically inorganic. Therefore, Substance A cannot be classified as a mineral.
-
Substance B:
- Definite chemical structure
- Naturally occurring
A definite chemical structure and being naturally occurring are both key characteristics of minerals. Therefore, Substance B can be classified as a mineral.
Now, we can evaluate the statements:
-
Substance A could be a mineral. Substance B is not a mineral.
- This is incorrect because Substance A cannot be a mineral, and Substance B is a mineral.
-
Substance A is a mineral. Substance B could be a mineral.
- This is incorrect because Substance A cannot be a mineral.
-
Substance A is not a mineral. Substance B is a mineral.
- This statement is correct based on our analysis.
-
Substance A is not a mineral. Substance B could be a mineral.
- Although Substance A is not a mineral, Substance B is not just a "could be"; it definitely is a mineral. Thus, this statement is misleading.
Therefore, the correct statement is: Substance A is not a mineral. Substance B is a mineral.