Sure! Here are the answers to the questions based on the scenarios provided:
-
For the first question regarding the angles formed by parallel lines cut by a transversal, since m∠PVT is given as 109°, m∠RWU would correspond to alternate interior angles. Thus, if these angles are equal, m∠RWU would also be 109°.
- Response: 109°
-
In the second question about alternate exterior angles, if m∠1 = 9x - 12 and m∠8 = 105°, we set them equal to each other because alternate exterior angles are equal: \[ 9x - 12 = 105 \] Solving for x: \[ 9x = 117 \quad → \quad x = 13 \]
- Response: 13
-
In the third question regarding supplementary angles formed by two parallel lines, consecutive interior angles are supplementary. Therefore, ∠B and ∠G would be classified under that condition.
- Response: ∠B and ∠G because they are consecutive interior angles
-
For the question about the perpendicular bisector theorem, since AC is the perpendicular bisector of BD and meets at point E, it implies that BE is equal to AE. This means: \[ BE = AE \]
- Response: It must be the same length as segment EA.
-
Regarding Lenny's proof of the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem, the mistake found was in identifying which segments are congruent based on the definition of a perpendicular bisector. Lenny incorrectly stated that IM is congruent to JM rather than stating that IL is congruent to JL.
- Response: The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that IL≅JL, not that IM≅JM.
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!