To complete Rachel's proof of the Base Angles Theorem, the missing statements and reasons can be filled in as follows:
For Statement 4, it should state: EK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅EK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ This is correct because it's referring to the segments that were shown to be congruent as part of the construction.
For Reason 6, it should state: CPCTC Theorem. This means "Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent," which is valid because triangles EKG and EKF are shown to be congruent, allowing us to conclude that their corresponding angles are also congruent.
So the completed proof would look like this:
| Statements | Reasons | |-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------| | 1. Isosceles △EFG with EG¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅EF¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ | 1. Given | | 2. K, the midpoint of GF¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ | 2. Construction | | 3. GK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅KF¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ | 3. Definition of midpoint | | 4. EK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅EK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ | 4. Reflexive property of congruence | | 5. △EKG≅△EKF | 5. SSS Congruence Theorem | | 6. ∠G≅∠F | 6. CPCTC Theorem |
This ensures the proof follows correctly to show that the angles opposite the congruent sides of the isosceles triangle are, indeed, congruent as stated by the Base Angles Theorem.