To determine the scale factor used by Kamla, we need to compare the corresponding sides of the two parallelograms.
In the first parallelogram:
- One side is 5 inches.
- The adjacent side is 3.5 inches.
In the second parallelogram:
- One side is 0.7 inches (corresponding to the 5 inches side of the first parallelogram).
- The adjacent side is 1 inch (corresponding to the 3.5 inches side of the first parallelogram).
Now, we calculate the scale factor for each corresponding pair of sides:
-
For the longer sides: \[ \text{Scale Factor} = \frac{\text{Length of side in 2nd parallelogram}}{\text{Length of side in 1st parallelogram}} = \frac{0.7}{5} = 0.14 \]
-
For the shorter sides: \[ \text{Scale Factor} = \frac{\text{Length of side in 2nd parallelogram}}{\text{Length of side in 1st parallelogram}} = \frac{1}{3.5} \approx 0.2857 \]
Since the scale factors for both pairs of corresponding sides need to be the same for them to be similar shapes, and they are not, we can conclude that there might have been a mistake in the observed dimensions or descriptions. However, based on the values provided for the second parallelogram, it appears we are being asked for a specific scale factor given in the responses.
To determine the correct answer from the options provided:
- The closest value that fits within a reasonable small scale factor is \(0.2\).
Thus, Kamla likely used a scale factor of 0.2.