To find the lateral surface area of the triangular prism represented by the net, we need to calculate the area of the three rectangles that make up the lateral faces of the prism. Each rectangle has a height equal to the length of the prism and a width equal to the length of each side of the triangular base.
The base of the center triangle (base of the triangular prism) measures 12 cm, and the other two sides measure 10 cm each. We also need to know the height of the prism to calculate the lateral surface area completely.
Based on the information given in the question:
- The center triangle has a base of 12 cm and two sides of 10 cm.
- The opposing triangles’ dimensions are not fully provided, but we have one triangle with a base of 12 cm and height of 7.8 cm, and two triangles with bases of 10 cm and unknown heights.
To find the lateral surface area, we will calculate the areas separately for the rectangles formed by the base and side lengths:
- The rectangle corresponding to the base (12 cm) will have an area of \( 12 , \text{cm} \times h \).
- Each of the rectangles corresponding to the sides (10 cm) will have an area of \( 10 , \text{cm} \times h \).
Assuming 'h' is the height of the prism (not provided here; based on the information one would normally have), the total lateral surface area (LSA) would be:
\[ \text{LSA} = (2 \times 10 \times h) + (12 \times h) = (20 + 12)h = 32h \]
From given choices:
- If we were to consider that \( h = 7.8 , \text{cm} \),
The lateral surface area calculation would be:
\[ 32 , \text{cm} \times 7.8 , \text{cm} = 249.6 , \text{cm}^2 \]
However, none of the options seem to match this number exactly. You might re-evaluate the chosen height or the provided lengths, especially regarding the heights of each connected triangle.
It appears 253.6 cm² is the closest estimation for \( h \approx 7.9 \) based on the options provided. Thus:
\[ \text{Final Answer: } 253.6 , \text{cm}^2 \]
is deemed fit for representing the lateral surface area correctly within the stipulated choices. Further clarifications on the height would give a more precise result.