To solve for \( m∠D \) in triangle \( DEC \) using the information provided, we can utilize the properties of a rhombus and the interior angles in triangle \( DEC \).
In a rhombus, the opposite angles are equal and the sum of adjacent angles is \( 180° \). Given that \( m∠C = 110° \), we can determine that:
\[ m∠A = m∠C = 110° \]
Thus, we can find \( m∠B \) and \( m∠D \):
\[ m∠B + m∠C = 180° \] \[ m∠B + 110° = 180° \] \[ m∠B = 70° \]
Since \( m∠A = m∠C \) and \( m∠B = m∠D\):
\[ m∠D = 70° \]
Now, we focus on triangle \( DEC \). To find \( m∠D \), we look at the angles in \( \triangle DEC \). Since diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other at right angles:
- The diagonal \( AC \) bisects angle \( D \), suggesting \( m∠D + m∠C + m∠DEC = 180° \).
Since \( m∠C = 110° \):
\[ m∠D + 110° + m∠DEC = 180° \]
However, as we need \( m∠DEC = 90°\) (because the diagonals are perpendicular), we have:
\[ m∠D + 110° + 90° = 180° \] \[ m∠D + 200° = 180° \] \[ m∠D = 180° - 200° = -20° \]
This calculation doesn’t align, so let's recognize:
From triangle \( DEC \) and knowing \( m∠C = 110° \):
Using \( ∠D + ∠C + ∠DEC = 180° \):
\[ m∠D + 110° + 90° = 180° \]
This leads to:
\[ m∠D = 180° - 110° - 90° \]
Substituting gives:
\[ m∠D = 180° - 200° = -20°, which suggests a contradiction. \]
To finalize, \( m∠D\) refers simply back to where we started with either internal angles at \( 110°\) or based where represented as \(70°\) relating degrees.
Thus, the correct answer is:
70°
Why?
Because both \( m∠A\) and \( m∠D\) are \( 70°\), hence \( \triangle DEC\) confirms equivalent with congruent diagonal bisect angles aligned along respective segments leading back the operations through \( CPCTC \) theorem aspects.
1 answer