To find the correct table that shows \( y = -f(x) \), we need to consider how the values of \( f(x) \) are transformed by multiplying them by -1. This transformation reflects the graph over the x-axis.
The values of \( y = -f(x) \) should be the negative of the corresponding values of \( f(x) \).
Let's analyze the given tables:
-
First Table:
- \( x \) | \( -f(x) \)
- -2 | ?
- 0 | ?
- -3 | ?
- -1 | ?
- -6 | ?
- -2 | ?
Here the transformation is not clear since \( f(x) \) values are not provided.
-
Second Table:
- \( x \) | \( -f(x) \)
- 2 | 0
- 3 | -1
- 6 | -2
Here, potential \( f(x) \) values could be:
- \( f(2) = 0 \)
- \( f(3) = 1 \) (since -f(3) = -1)
- \( f(6) = 2 \) (since -f(6) = -2)
-
Third Table:
- \( x \) | \( -f(x) \)
- -2 | ?
- 0 | ?
- -3 | 1
- -6 | 2
Here also \( f(x) \) values are uncertain.
-
Fourth Table:
- \( x \) | \( -f(x) \)
- 2 | 0
- 3 | 1
- 6 | 2
Here, potential \( f(x) \) values could be:
- \( f(2) = 0 \) (since -f(2) = 0)
- \( f(3) = -1 \) (since -f(3) = 1)
- \( f(6) = -2 \) (since -f(6) = 2)
After analyzing the tables, it seems that the second table correctly shows the relationship of \( y = -f(x) \) because the \( -f(x) \) values are indeed the negatives of reasonable \( f(x) \) values.
Thus, the correct answer is the second table.