To describe the series of transformations between the triangles \( ABC \) and \( A''B''C'' \), we need to analyze the triangles' coordinates and how they relate to each other.
Triangle \( ABC \) has the following vertices:
- \( A(-4, 5) \)
- \( B(-1, 3) \)
- \( C(-3, 1) \)
Triangle \( A''B''C'' \) has the following vertices:
- \( A''(1, 0) \)
- \( B''(-2, -2) \)
- \( C''(0, -4) \)
Comparing the coordinates of both triangles, we can see they do not have the same orientation. Therefore, triangle \( ABC \) and triangle \( A''B''C'' \) are not congruent.
Next, we also look for a transformation that relates triangle \( ABC \) to triangles \( A'B'C' \) and \( A''B''C'' \).
-
Triangle \( ABC \) is to triangle \( A'B'C' \):
- Triangle \( ABC \) vertices are in the left-half of the coordinate system, while triangle \( A'B'C' \) vertices are in the right-half. This indicates a reflection across the y-axis.
-
Triangle \( A'B'C' \) can be seen to transform into triangle \( A''B''C'' \), and either requires a rotation or translation.
To describe the transformations correctly specifically as responses given:
- Triangles \( ABC \) and \( A''B''C'' \) do not maintain the same orientation, and we conclude they are not congruent.
- However, a reflection followed by a translation may or may not accurately reflect the process, needing to define rotations distinctly too.
Given this description, the appropriate choice from the options provided is: "Since triangles upper A upper B upper C and upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime do not have the same orientation, they are not congruent."