Use the image to answer the question.



3 rectangles, each labeled x, 2 rectangles, each labeled negative x, 5 squares, each labeled 1, and 2 squares, each labeled negative 1
























Which models represent algebraic expressions equivalent to the algebraic expression represented by the model shown?

Select the two correct answers. 

(1 point)
Responses

2 rectangles, each labeled x, 2 rectangles, each labeled negative x, 2 squares, each labeled 1, and 2 squares, each labeled negative 1
Image with alt text: 2 rectangles, each labeled x, 2 rectangles, each labeled negative x, 2 squares, each labeled 1, and 2 squares, each labeled negative 1

2 rectangles, each labeled x, 1 rectangle labeled negative x, 4 squares, each labeled 1, and 1 square labeled negative 1
Image with alt text: 2 rectangles, each labeled x, 1 rectangle labeled negative x, 4 squares, each labeled 1, and 1 square labeled negative 1

3 rectangles, each labeled x, 1 rectangle labeled negative x, 5 squares, each labeled 1, and 1 square labeled negative 1
Image with alt text: 3 rectangles, each labeled x, 1 rectangle labeled negative x, 5 squares, each labeled 1, and 1 square labeled negative 1

1 rectangle labeled x and 1 square labeled 1
Image with alt text: 1 rectangle labeled x and 1 square labeled 1

1 rectangle, each labeled x and 3 squares, each labeled 1
Image with alt text: 1 rectangle, each labeled x and 3 squares, each labeled 1
Skip to navigation

1 answer

To evaluate which models represent algebraic expressions equivalent to the original model, let's analyze the components of the first model you described:

  • 3 rectangles labeled x
  • 2 rectangles labeled -x
  • 5 squares labeled 1
  • 2 squares labeled -1

Now, let's translate these into an algebraic expression:

  1. The total contribution from the rectangles:

    • \(3x\) for the \(3\) rectangles labeled \(x\)
    • \(2(-x)\) or \(-2x\) for the \(2\) rectangles labeled \(-x\)

    Combining these gives: \[ 3x - 2x = x \]

  2. The total contribution from the squares:

    • \(5(1)\) or \(5\) for the \(5\) squares labeled \(1\)
    • \(2(-1)\) or \(-2\) for the \(2\) squares labeled \(-1\)

    Combining these gives: \[ 5 - 2 = 3 \]

Thus, the overall expression represented by the model is: \[ x + 3 \]

Now we need to find equivalent expressions among the provided options:

  1. Option: \(2 rectangles, each labeled x, 2 rectangles, each labeled -x, 2 squares, each labeled 1, and 2 squares, each labeled -1\)

    • This translates to:
      • \(2x - 2x + 2 - 2 = 0\)
    • Not equivalent to \(x + 3\).
  2. Option: \(2 rectangles, each labeled x, 1 rectangle labeled -x, 4 squares, each labeled 1, and 1 square labeled -1\)

    • This translates to:
      • \(2x - x + 4 - 1 = x + 3\)
    • This is equivalent to \(x + 3\).
  3. Option: \(3 rectangles, each labeled x, 1 rectangle labeled -x, 5 squares, each labeled 1, and 1 square labeled -1\)

    • This translates to:
      • \(3x - x + 5 - 1 = 2x + 4\)
    • Not equivalent to \(x + 3\).
  4. Option: \(1 rectangle labeled x and 1 square labeled 1\)

    • This translates to:
      • \(x + 1\)
    • Not equivalent to \(x + 3\).
  5. Option: \(1 rectangle labeled x and 3 squares, each labeled 1\)

    • This translates to:
      • \(x + 3\)
    • This is also equivalent to \(x + 3\).

Thus, the two correct answers are:

  • Option 2: \(2 rectangles, each labeled x, 1 rectangle labeled -x, 4 squares, each labeled 1, and 1 square labeled -1\)
  • Option 5: \(1 rectangle labeled x and 3 squares, each labeled 1\)