Question

Use the graph to answer the question. Which of the following best explains the difference between Tennessee and Mississippi on this graph? (1 point) Responses Mississippi had more battles because it was on the coast. Mississippi had more battles because it was on the coast. Mississippi had fewer battles because it was on the Mississippi River. Mississippi had fewer battles because it was on the Mississippi River. Tennessee had many more battles because it was closer to Union territory. Tennessee had many more battles because it was closer to Union territory. Tennessee had many more battles because it remained part of the Union.

Answer 1

To determine the best explanation for the difference between Tennessee and Mississippi based on the number of battles indicated in the graph, we need to analyze the possible responses.

1. Mississippi had more battles because it was on the coast: This is misleading as Mississippi does not have a significant coastal presence compared to other states.

2. Mississippi had fewer battles because it was on the Mississippi River: While being on the Mississippi River could affect battle locations, it wouldn't straightforwardly explain fewer battles in a direct comparison with Tennessee.

3. Tennessee had many more battles because it was closer to Union territory: This is a strong possibility. Tennessee's geographic location made it a key battleground closer to the divides between the Union and Confederate territories.

4. Tennessee had many more battles because it remained part of the Union: This is incorrect, as Tennessee was actually a Confederate state during most of the Civil War.

Based on the above analysis, the best explanation would likely be:

Tennessee had many more battles because it was closer to Union territory.