I find it wholesome to be alone the greater part of the time. To be in company, even with the best, is soon wearisome and dissipating. I love to be alone, I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude. We are for the most part more lonely when we go abroad among men than when we stay in our chambers. A man thinking or working is always alone, let him be where he will. Solitude is not measured by the miles of space that intervene between a man and his fellows.
What is the best way to interpret the paradox "I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude"?
(1 point)
Responses
He is asking them to focus on the downside of being lonely.
He is asking them to focus on the downside of being lonely.
He is asking them to focus on the importance of close relationships.
He is asking them to focus on the importance of close relationships.
He is asking them to consider the benefits of having companions.
He is asking them to consider the benefits of having companions.
He is asking them to consider the benefits of spending time alone.
He is asking them to consider the benefits of spending time alone.
Skip to navigation
1 answer
The best way to interpret the paradox "I never found the companion that was so companionable as solitude" is:
He is asking them to consider the benefits of spending time alone.
This interpretation aligns with Thoreau's emphasis on the value he finds in solitude, suggesting that he feels more fulfilled and at peace when alone than when with others.
