To answer the question about how the quotation from a prior case strengthens the ruling in Tinker, the best response is that it emphasizes the importance of public protest by challenging the idea that students maintain their First Amendment rights at school. The majority opinion in Tinker asserts that students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate. By referencing previous rulings that highlight the need to protect First Amendment rights—even in schools—the opinion reinforces the notion that expressing dissenting views, such as those represented by the anti-war protests in Tinker, is a vital aspect of democracy and should be permitted in educational settings. This understanding clarifies that student protests are valid forms of expression that warrant protection under the Constitution, thus strengthening the foundation of the ruling.
Use the excerpt from the Supreme Court majority opinion in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, written by Justice Fortas, to answer the question. How does the quotation from a prior case strengthen the ruling in Tinker? (1 point) Responses by emphasizing the importance of public protest by emphasizing the importance of public protest by challenging the idea that students maintain their First Amendment rights at school by challenging the idea that students maintain their First Amendment rights at school by citing the precedent that Boards of Education must act within the Bill of Rights by citing the precedent that Boards of Education must act within the Bill of Rights by comparing saluting the flag to anti-war protests
1 answer