To determine which idea is supported by the evidence from the excerpt, you would need to analyze the specific details and context presented in the text. However, without the actual excerpt to reference, I can provide a general guideline on how to choose the best option based on typical content related to Nellie Bly's investigation.
If the excerpt includes statements about neglect of patients, dismissive attitudes from psychiatrists, or lack of care, you might lean towards the first option: "Psychiatrists did not care about their patients and found them to be a nuisance."
If it discusses any actions taken by psychiatrists to obscure the truth or deny allegations while being aware of the investigation, option two could be supported: "Psychiatrists knew their secrets were being exposed and were trying to do 'damage control' to repair their image."
If there are mentions of overcrowding, long waits, or inability to address individual patient needs adequately, then the third option could be a fit: "Psychiatrists were overwhelmed with patients and could not conduct their practice thoroughly."
Lastly, if the text describes efforts by psychiatrists to prevent information from getting out or suppressing negative stories, the fourth option would be applicable: "Psychiatrists were trying to stop information about their practice at the asylum from reaching the public."
Please select the option that best matches the content of the excerpt.