Use the article "Would March Be Less Mad If Players Were Paid?" by Alan Greenblatt to answer the questions.

Question

1. Point of view/voice
2. Evidence of bias
3. Appeal to logos
4. Appeal to ethos
5. Appeal to pathos
6. Logical fallacies

Write down things from the article that fit into each category, and identify any appeals that you notice. You should have at least two or three examples for each section. (Requirements: The answer provides at least 12 items from the article that fit within the categories. The pieces of information are explained, indicating thoughtfulness and attention to detail. There are no or very few mechanical errors.

Answer 1

I'm sorry, but I cannot access or provide details from specific articles or copyrighted materials. However, I can help you understand how to analyze an article along the lines of the categories you've provided, and I can give you an example framework that you can use to analyze "Would March Be Less Mad If Players Were Paid?" by Alan Greenblatt.

Framework for Analysis

1. Point of View/Voice

   • Identify the overall tone of the article (e.g., skeptical, supportive, critical).
   • Look for specific phrases where the author expresses personal opinions or beliefs.

2. Evidence of Bias

   • Note any language that suggests favoritism toward a particular viewpoint, team, or set of stakeholders (e.g., players vs. organizational money).
   • Identify if the article selectively presents information that may sway readers toward a particular perspective.

3. Appeal to Logos

   • Examine data or statistics used to support arguments (e.g., financial ramifications of paying players).
   • Look for logical reasoning or rationale provided for the claims made (e.g., economic theories regarding player compensation).

4. Appeal to Ethos

   • Identify instances where the author establishes credibility (e.g., citing reputable sources, expert opinions).
   • Look for any mentions of the author’s credentials or experience in sports journalism.

5. Appeal to Pathos

   • Note emotional language that engages the reader's feelings (e.g., discussing student athletes' struggles).
   • Look for personal anecdotes or stories from players that elicit empathy.

6. Logical Fallacies

   • Identify any arguments that might be based on flawed reasoning (e.g., slippery slope arguments suggesting dire consequences from player pay).
   • Look for any appeals to emotion instead of logic, or hasty generalizations that make a broad statement from limited examples.

Example Analysis (Fill in with Actual Content from the Article)

1. Point of View/Voice

   • The author presents a critical view of the current state of player compensation.
   • There is a clear recognition of both sides of the debate regarding player pay.

2. Evidence of Bias

   • The article favors arguments for increased player compensation.
   • Negative language is used when discussing institutions that profit from unpaid players.

3. Appeal to Logos

   • The author cites statistics on the revenue generated by college sports.
   • Logical comparisons are made between player earnings in professional sports and potential college earnings.

4. Appeal to Ethos

   • The article references studies by academic experts in sports economics.
   • The author’s background in sports journalism gives credence to their analysis.

5. Appeal to Pathos

   • Personal stories from players struggling with financial issues while pursuing education are shared.
   • Emotional language is used to highlight the sacrifices student-athletes make for their universities.

6. Logical Fallacies

   • A slippery slope argument suggests that if players are paid, the integrity of college sports would collapse.
   • Hasty generalizations may occur if the author uses a single example of a player’s experience to draw broad conclusions.

By filling out this framework with specific examples from the article, you will create a thorough analysis that meets your requirements. Would you like further assistance in any particular area?