Argument 1: Video games are fun, but they make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise.
Argument 2: Video games help teach teenagers to perform more than one task at the same time.
On which point do these two arguments disagree?
(1 point)
Responses
whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers
whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers
whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
whether or not video games make teenagers more passive
whether or not video games make teenagers more passive
whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play
whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play
Remaining Attempts : 3
2 answers
The two arguments disagree on the point of whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise.
Argument 1 suggests that video games reduce physical exercise, implying they do not serve as a good substitute. In contrast, Argument 2 focuses on the positive cognitive benefits of video games, without addressing their physical implications, and does not imply anything about exercise.
