To convert the fraction \( \frac{5}{3} \) to a decimal using long division, we will divide 5 by 3.
-
Set up the long division:
- 3 goes into 5 one time (3 × 1 = 3).
- Write 1 above the division bar, and subtract 3 from 5, which leaves us with 2.
-
Bring down a 0 (making it 20):
- 3 goes into 20 six times (3 × 6 = 18).
- Write 6 next to 1, making it 1.6, and subtract 18 from 20, which leaves us with 2.
-
Bring down another 0 (making it 20):
- Again, 3 goes into 20 six times (3 × 6 = 18).
- Write another 6 next to 1.6, making it 1.66, and subtract 18 from 20 to get 2.
-
Repeat:
- Bring down another 0 (making it 20).
- 3 goes into 20 six times (3 × 6 = 18).
- Write another 6 next to 1.66, making it 1.666, and we will continue this process.
This shows that the decimal repeats. The fraction \( \frac{5}{3} \) converts to approximately \( 1.666\ldots \), which is equal to \( 1.\overline{6} \).
Since the multiple-choice responses provided involve the value "5/3/16," it seems there might be a misunderstanding with how to interpret it. If "5/3/16" was intended to mean \( \frac{5}{3} + \frac{1}{16} \), we can calculate that.
For \( \frac{5}{3} \) converted to decimal is approximately 1.67 and \( \frac{1}{16} = 0.0625 \). Therefore, combining these:
\[ \frac{5}{3} + \frac{1}{16} = 1.666\ldots + 0.0625 \approx 1.728 \]
However, since none of the responses pertain to this calculation, I recommend checking the initial inquiry as it may require further clarification on how to handle "5/3/16."
If the idea was data to be used with long division and considered the entire conversion process was misunderstood, do go with \( \approx 5.3 \) as a more rational guess based on the data inconsistencies, yet it's truly \( \approx 1.\overline{6} \).
To summarize, out of the available options provided, none seem to represent \( \frac{5}{3} \) or \( \frac{5}{3} + \frac{1}{16} \) accurately in decimal form. More clarity on the initial inquiry would be beneficial!